1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to secondary-content




Cool Stupid.

By: svergara, Jul 03, 2008
Tags: Video Games, movies |

Me [right after watching Wanted]: It was stupid.

My friend Laurel: Yeah, but it was cool stupid.

Some of my friends think I’m something of a movie snob, and honestly, I’m not, but people still think my first reaction to the summer movie season is usually running for cover. On the contrary: I happily succumb to its adolescent delights every single year. This summer’s lineup, in particular, is shaping up to be a darn fine one, what with lots of stuff being blow’d up and unchecked CGI abuse everywhere.

An example, as hinted above, of “cool stupid”: Timur Bekmambetov’s Wanted. There’s no need to rehash the ridiculous plot here; it’s about an elite fraternity of weaver-assassins with incredible muscle control, but who seem to forget their skills at inopportune moments. It also features Angelina Jolie, who isn’t really called upon to act, because all she needs to do is be there. (She steals scenes using only her lips, glistening crimsonly in the background, even when she’s out of focus.) Wanted is taken from a comic by Mark Millar, but it doesn’t even have the emotional depth of a graphic novel; it’s pure adrenalin-fueled videogame goodness wired directly into your brain. (Come to think of it, it shares an odd narrative resemblance with Kung Fu Panda, though without the cuteness or culinary gracenotes of the latter.)

When I talk about “videogame movies”, though, I’m not talking about such horrors as House of the Dead or Silent Hill, both movies made from video games — stinkers all, except for the hilarious 3D sequence in Doom. And I’m not talking about films that seem like trailers for the inevitable amusement park ride, like Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, whose entire middle section practically sketches out the roller coaster’s architecture. Wanted, in contrast, seems to play exactly like something on an Xbox 360, complete with bad cutscenes, training sequences where you master different skills (there’s even the equivalent here of a “Retry Mission” do-over), different boss levels, and so on. Wanted has all the thrills of an immersive game practically unhampered by narrative requirements.

There’s a side-effect to all this, of course (and no, please spare me the lecture on movie violence). It has to do, ultimately, with reducing the audience (and the target market) to that of a 15-year old boy. The way the market works — and I’m still surprised by all the attention given to box-office receipts in this country, or who paid who for what and how much at Cannes or Sundance — is that the producers of the cool stupid movies can simply point to the numbers and logically say, “This is obviously what the public wants.” It’s not much of a surprise when the audience isn’t given much of a choice, though. (These movies are also, inevitably, what get exported around the world, to be peddled to folks in Asia as the cream of American cinema; nothing like using bullets to traverse cultural borders.) In turn, similar projects get the green light and the funding, thus fueling the vicious cycle of mediocrity. (There’s a political resonance about this too, about governments and the consent of the governed, but we won’t go there.)

Sometimes, though, it’s exactly what the audience wants. I was certainly one gratified customer. What Wanted actually does most impressively — other than the exhilaration of its action sequences — is to cram the highlights of cult movie-geekery in the last decade into just one film: every mock-ironic torture scene since Reservoir Dogs, the bullet-time sequences from The Matrix (with The Killer and Hard Boiled as its antecedents), Office Space’s bureaucratic tedium, and the sardonic nihilism of Fight Club. There’s surely a kind of art in this. The next time a self-proclaimed movie snob (like me) talks to you about “discerning” audiences, or the “dumbing down” of American cinema, tell them there’s a time and place for cool stupid. It’s summer time after all.

———-

I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention one movie currently in theaters that’s well worth your time, quietly competing for your attention amidst Hellboy 2 and The Dark Knight: Yung Chang’s brilliant debut documentary, Up the Yangtze, on China’s Three Gorges Dam Project. I wrote on my other blog that “Chang has such a remarkable sense of drama and rhythm, for the elegant ebb and flow of the parade of ordinary images before the camera — so much so that it feels less and less a documentary than a narrative feature,” but don’t take my word for it. Here’s the Metacritic review summary, but most illuminating of all is the Angry Asian Man interview with the director.

Comments

  1. Just added DOOM to my netflix queue; forgot about that one, thanks!

    –Jesse! on Jul 03, 2008

  2. i just like how all these films now have such an Asian undertone to them. They are all following in the footsteps of Bruce Lee on the Green Hornet.
    Probably the movie studios are making a lot of money from Asian customers who can relate to the kung fu choreography that is so prominent in action films today

    –not a prude on Jul 03, 2008

  3. We both blogged about Wanted today. Your review reveals why you do this professionally :)
    I can’t think too much about that movie because it was so wack in so many ways. Just one point–the movie featured more rodents than women. Angelina’s iconic stature amongst teen boys and lezzzbians, removes her from the mortal female realm. Which means there only two other women in the movie:the fat boss and the dumb girlfriend. Rats, 500,000 - Women, 2.
    Wanna go see Hancock? I do!

    –Lunamania on Jul 03, 2008

  4. Jesse: you kind of have to have been a Doom player back in the day to appreciate it. I only I saw it in the theaters so I can hear the audience go “Woooah!”

    Not a Prude: Right — but I think it’s also about Hollywood’s appropriation of the Hong Kong action ’70s / ’80s movie aesthetic. You don’t have to be Asian anymore to recognize the wire-fu and slo-mo bullet sequences!

    Lunamania’s too shy to link to her entry about Wanted, so here it is: http://lunamania.org/2008/07/03/oh-angelina. You’re right about the movie’s overemphasis on James McAvoy (funny — the last movie I saw him in was “The Last King of Scotland”, where he similarly gets the stuffing beat out of him). Not enough Jolie, which didn’t make me tres jolie.

    –svergara on Jul 04, 2008

  5. This proves your point: two people who recently raved about Wanted to me were two stay-at-home mothers in their early thirties who actually went to see it twice. They definitely don’t have much in common with teenage boys but they were more than happy to re-immerse themselves in “adolescent delights” (can you blame them, spending all their time caring for young children?). The first time they went for Angelina; the second time for James McAvoy. They actually had to get baby-sitting for this, so this was a big deal to them. I plan to see it eventually since I like the cool stupid myself and am looking forward to the Matrix-like CGI. And yes to Hancock!

    –gladys on Jul 08, 2008

  6. “A second time for James McAvoy” — hmmmm. Life’s a little too short to go for *that* reason. =) But run off to a multiplex, Gladys, before all the screens get taken over by “The Dark Knight” in a couple of weeks!

    –Sunny Vergara on Jul 10, 2008

  7. Re: Gladys’ comment, I think it’s so interesting, these women going to see Angelina first, then James McAvoy second. I find neither appealing: Angelina’s porn-y sex appeal for hetero adolescent boys (does her porn-y-ness appeal to hetero women?), or that I’ve only really seen McAvoy as Mr. Tumnus, and as rumor has it, possibly the next Bilbo Baggins.

    –BJR on Jul 10, 2008

  8. One would have to be seriously kinky to find Mr. Tumnus sexually appealing, but I’m sure there are people out there.

    That is rather odd, about McAvoy’s appeal to Gladys’ women friends — his role in “Wanted” is that of the classic deskbound (albeit good-looking) nerd who discovers he’s a badass. But the lesson he learns here is the one Dustin Hoffman learns in “Straw Dogs” (or more blatantly, Ed Norton in “Fight Club”), i.e., the reclaiming of masculinity through purgative violence.

    –Sunny Vergara on Jul 10, 2008

  9. Sorry I’m a week late on this, but I believe the appeal to these women were as follows: Angelina, first-person subject; James McAvoy, sexual object.

    And whoa, Mr. Tumnus! Thankfully I’ve seen McAvoy in respectably romantic roles (Starter for Ten and a Foyle’s War episode) and don’t remember him as the creepy, vaguely-pedophilic satyr in Narnia.

    –gladys on Jul 17, 2008

  10. I should clarify that I didn’t meant to be hard-line hetero about it, but that is what I gathered from the two women’s conversation with me. However, I don’t want to discount a possibly erotic fascination with Angelina nor an identification with McAvoy’s character’s violent breakthrough. In fact, it’s probably more common for women to identify with male characters in patriarchal systems, whether or not such male characters participate in a “reclaiming of masculinity through purgative violence.” (Example: I identified more with Harry Potter than Hermione Granger, even though I was just like her as a kid.) A question that interests me is whether being young mothers makes these women more susceptible to an identification with this kind of violent reclamation of self. (!)

    –gladys on Jul 17, 2008

Post your comments.

Comments using inappropriate language will not be posted. AsianWeek reserves the right to re-publish comments, into "Letters to the Editor," in which case, we reserve the right to edit comments for length and style. If you would like to write a letter to our editor, please email: asianweek@asianweek.com.


© 2005-2008 AsianWeek. The information you receive on-line from AsianWeek is protected by the copyright laws of the United States. The copyright laws prohibit any copying, redistributing, retransmitting, or repurposing of any copyright protected material. Privacy Policy